Financial Statement Analysis of Fraud with Hexagon Theory Fraud Approach

Authors

  • Raihan Noval Akbar Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Adam Zakaria Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Rida Prihatni Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Keywords:

Financial statement fraud, Fraud Hexagon Theory, Stimulus, Capability, Collusion, Opportunity, Rationalization, Ego

Abstract

This research was conducted to find the effect of shareshexagon theory that consisted of stimulus, capability, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego on financial statement fraud. The data used in this research is secondary data in the annual reports obtained through the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) website. The population of this research is the banking listed on IDX in 2018 – 2020. The sample selection in this research used a purposive sampling technique and resulted in 47 companies as the sample of research. This Research use quantitative methods. The analytical technique used are descriptive statistical and multiple linear regression. The results of this study indicated that collusion negatively affects financial statement fraud. Rationalization has a positive effect on financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, stimulus, capability, opportunity, and ego has no effect on financial statement fraud.

References

ACFE. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Annisya, M., Lindrianasari, & Asmaranti, Y. (2016). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi (JBE), 23(1), 72–89.

Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036

Asadanie, N. K., & Venusita, L. (2020). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. INVENTORY : Jurnal Akuntasi, 4(1), 14–21.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse: 2020 global fraud study. Acfe, 88.

Banjarnaor, D. (2018). Drama Bank Bukopin: Kartu Kredit Modifikasi dan Rights Issue. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20180427144303-17-12810/dramabank-bukopin-kartu-kredit-modifikasi-dan-rights-issue

Bawekes, H. F. (2018). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114–134.

Beneish, M. D. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296

Butje, S., & Tjondro, E. (2014). Pengaruh Karakteristik Eksekutif dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(1), 1–9.

Cahyaningtyas, R. I., & Achsin, M. (2018). Studi fenomenologi kecurangan mahasiswa dalam pelaporan pertanggungjawaban dana kegiatan mahasiswa: sebuah realita dan pengakuan. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.003

Christian, N., & Visakha, B. (2021). Analisis Teori Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraud pada Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. 1(1), 1325–1342.

Crowe. (2011). Welcome! Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough.

Damayani, F., Wahyudi, T., & Yuniartie, E. (2019). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Infrastruktur Yangterdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesiatahun 2014 – 2016. AKUNTABILITAS: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Akuntansi, 11(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v11i2.8936

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, “low balling”, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17– 82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Desviana, D., Basri, Y. M., & Nasrizal, N. (2020). Analisis Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.3.1.50- 73

Faccio, M. (2006). Politically Connected Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.444960

Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008

Faradiza, A. S. (2019). FRAUD PENTAGON DAN KECURANGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN Sekar Akrom Faradiza. Sekar Akrom Faradiza, 4988, 1–22.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Mutivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Harahap, A. T. D., Majidah, & Triyanto, D. N. (2017). Pengujian Fraud Diamond dalam Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011 - 2015). EProceeding of Management, Vol.4(1), 420–427.

Hidayah, E., & Saptarini, G. D. (2019). Pentagon Fraud Analysis in Detecting Potential Financial statement fraud of Banking Companies in Indonesia. International Conference on Acoounting, Business, & Economics, 2010, 89– 102.

Howarth, C. (2011). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. Horwath, Crowe, 94(8), 14. Indarti, I. (2019). Beneish Ratio Index. 1(1), 57–66.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Racial diversity and its asymmetry within and across hierarchical levels: The effects on financial performance. Human Relations, 72(10), 1671–1696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602

Matangkin, L., Ng, S., & Mardiana, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kemampuan Manajerial Dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Reaksi Investor Dengan Kecurangan Laporan Keungan Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Simak, 16(02), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.35129/simak.v16i02.42

Mertha Jaya, I. M. L., & Poerwono, A. A. A. (2019). Pengujian Teori Fraudpentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaanpertambangandiindonesia. Akuntabilitas, 12(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v12i2.12587

Oktafiana, N. F., Nisa, K., & Sari, S. P. (2019). Analisis Fraud Laporan Keuangan dengan Wolfe & Hermanson’s Fraud Diamond Model Pada Perusahaan LQ45 di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Prosiding The 5th Seminar Nasional, 246–258.

Purba, E. L. D., & Putra, S. (2017). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial statement fraud: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Tahun 2016 – 2018. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 05(01), 2. https://doi.org/10.25105/semnas.v0i0.5780

Purwoto, O. L. (2011). Ringkasan Disertasi pada ujian Terbuka Pengaruh koneksl politis , kepemilikan pemerintah . dan keburaman laporan keuangan femadap kesinkronan dan risil < o crash harga saham.

Putri, V. R. (2018). Keterkaitan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak dengan Good Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Perbankan, 4(1), 20–28. http://journal.ibs.ac.id/index.php/JEMP/article/view/119

Putriasih, K., Herawati, N. N. T., & Wahyuni, M. arie. (2016). ANALISIS FRAUD DIAMOND DALAM MENDETEKSI FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD : STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI) TAHUN 2013-2015. E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 6.

Putriasih, K., Herawatti, N. N. T., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2016). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial statement fraud: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Tahun 2016 – 2018. E-Journal Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 6(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25105/semnas.v0i0.5780

Ratnasari, E., & Solikhah, B. (2019). Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Statement: the Fraud Pentagon Theory Approach Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Pendekatan Fraud Pentagon Theory. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(2), 98–112.

Ristianingsih, I. (2017). Telaah konsep fraud diamond theory dalam mendeteksi perilaku fraud di perguruan tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Paper Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2017, 131.

Sabrina, O. Z., Midiastuty, P. P., & Suranta, E. (2020). Pengaruh koneksitas organ corporate governance, ineffective monitoring dan manajemen laba terhadap fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Manajemen, 1(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v1i2.11

Sari, N. S., Sofyan, A., & Fastaqlaili, N. (2019). Analysis of Fraud Diamond Dimension in Detecting Financial statement fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 5(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v5i2.4861

Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2020). Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia. 1st Annual Conference of Ihtifaz, 409–430. http://seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/ihtifaz/article/download/3641/1023

Sasongko, N., & Wijayantika, S. F. (2019). Faktor Resiko Fraud Terhadap Pelaksanaan Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Berdasarkan Pendekatan Crown’S Fraud Pentagon Theory). Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v4i1.7809

Septriyani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 11–23. http://jurnal.pcr.ac.id

Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon : Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Listed Di BEI Tahun 2014-2016 Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia , 3 ( 2 ), 2018. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1953), 91–106.

Siddiq, R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar. (2017). Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement. Seminar Nasional Dan the 4Th Call Syariah Paper, ISSN 2460-0784, 1–14. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/9210

Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial statement fraud: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Tahun 2016 – 2018. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 03, 2. https://doi.org/10.25105/semnas.v0i0.5780

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2011). Detecting and Predicting Financial statement fraud: The Effectiveness of the Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99. SSRN Electronic Journal, 99. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1295494

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (26th ed.). Alfabeta. Suharyani, R., Ulum, I., & Jati, A. W. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan Stakeholder dan Coporate Governance terhadap kualitas sustainabilityy report. 2(1), 71–92.

Suyono, E. (2017). Bebagai Model Pengukuran Earnings Management : Mana Yang Paling Akurat. Ekonomi, 7(September), 303–324. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Eko_Suyono2/publication/321490082_ Berbagai_Model_Pengukuran_Earnings_Management_Mana_yang_Paling_ Akurat/links/5a2793cea6fdcc8e866e792d/Berbagai-Model-PengukuranEarnings-Management-Mana-yang-Paling-Akurat.pdf

Triyanto, D. N. (2019). Fraudulence Financial Statements Analysis using Pentagon Fraud Approach. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 2(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v2i2.22641

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2012). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif (Tim Editor Salemba Empat (ed.); 2nd ed.). Salemba Empat.

Ulfah, M., Nuraina, E., & Wijaya, A. L. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris Pada Perbankan Di Indonesia Yang Terdaftar Di Bei. Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi, Vol 5 No.(1), 1–19.

Vivianita, A., & Indudewi, D. (2018). Financial statement fraud pada Perusahaan Pertamangan yang Dipengaruhi oleh Fraud Pentagon Theory. Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 20(1), 1–15. http://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jdsb/article/view/1229/796

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017- 0128 Widyanti, T., & Nuryatno, M. (2018). Analisis Rasio Keuangan Sebagai Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 72–80.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125(December 2016), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.035

Yesiariani, M., & Rahayu, I. (2017). Deteksi financial statement fraud: Pengujian dengan fraud diamond. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 21(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol21.iss1.art5

Yusof. K, M., Khair A.H., A., & Simon, J. (2015). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Application of Fraud Models to Malaysian Public Listed Companies. The Macrotheme Review, 2(4), 144–160.

Zimbelman, M. F., Albercht, C. C., Albercht, W. S., & Albercht, C. O. (2014). Akuntansi Forensik (S. Empat (ed.); 4th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Zulfa, K., & Bayagub, A. (2018). Analisis Elemen-Elemen Fraud Pentagon Sebagai Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Keberlanjutan, 3(2), 950. https://doi.org/10.32493/keberlanjutan.v3i2.y2018.p950-969

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Raihan Noval Akbar, Adam Zakaria, & Rida Prihatni. (2022). Financial Statement Analysis of Fraud with Hexagon Theory Fraud Approach. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan Dan Auditing, 3(1), 137-161. Retrieved from http://103.8.12.68/index.php/japa/article/view/620

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>